Warning Bells: PMQs 16.10.24

The Starmernaut continues to roll over the Opposition. Sir Keir is hardly trying: he repeated his ‘14 years’ reference to the Tories’ failures at least three times in this session, though when he wheeled out the old ‘22 billion black hole’ shtick there was a general groan from the benches opposite.

Parliament may soon tire of his arrogance and habit of resorting to counterattack instead of reasoning. When Rishi Sunak spoke of China’s influence in British universities and deplored the Education Secretary’s block on last year’s Freedom of Speech Act Starmer simply swatted it away as ‘political point scoring’; even the BBC roused itself to highlight that one on Twitter/X.

This came after Sunak’s remarks on China’s ‘intimidatory’ military exercises in the Taiwan Strait, which Starmer agreed were ‘not conducive to peace and stability.’ Neither speaker mentioned Britain’s surrender of the strategically-positioned Chagos Islands to China-matey Mauritius, a decision reportedly taken in response to pressure (why?) from the Biden administration. The United Nations maritime court in Hamburg had ruled in favour of Mauritius’ claim in 2021, but as we know a sovereign British Parliament, unlike most governments around the world, has the power to override international law. Why does the PM think this a good moment to cede such a significant asset, when China is flexing its muscles?

Sunak turned to another area of conflict, asking the PM to sanction Chinese businesses and individuals supplying Russia with resources in the latter’s fight with Ukraine. Readers will recall that last month Starmer consulted Washington (again) for permission to help Ukraine fire rockets into the Russian motherland. The answer was no; at least, not until after the Presidential election. What will Kamala say?

In this context it is interesting to note how Russia has also become a serviceable bogeyman for the Director General of MI5, according to whom the Russkies have been planning mayhem on Britain’s streets, though he then admitted that most of the agency’s work is still occupied with ‘Islamist extremism followed by extreme right-wing terrorism.’ Coincidentally or not, the ‘novichok poisoning’ enquiry into the death of Salisbury resident Dawn Sturgess has just opened; former diplomat Craig Murray scornfully reviews the official claims made around that affair. Perhaps all this connects with the impending governmental Spending Review.

Lancastrian MP Cat Smith (Labour) opened her question with a reference to the new Bill to abolish hereditary members of the House of Lords. Sir Keir seized on this triumphantly (perhaps when Giggle is Prez one may have to say ‘joyously’), but of all the calamities he seems intent on provoking the destruction of our tripartite self-government may be the worst.

Law is downstream of power, and at the moment the British people - as a whole - have the power, however imperfectly the commoners are represented. The republican noises made in Australia are merely an overture to the planned abolition of our monarchy. There will still be a national leader, and ACL Blair wanted to be it; the Royal Yacht was scrapped but at least Gordon Brown was able to cancel the plans for ‘Blair Force One.’

In 1980 the otherwise great Parliamentarian Tony Benn proposed the outright abolition of the House of Lords, which would tear away the second leg of the three-legged stool; is this not where Starmer’s 400-strong MP contingent are heading, cutting away at the Upper House like Lear’s elder daughters stripping his entourage?

Then we shall be left with a single party machine, its whims unrestrained; a tyranny of the majority, with a great Chairman directing the nation.

Hear those warning bells.

(From Wolves of Westminster, with slight alterations.)