Stop smashing the system!
We need to be clear: the aim of the Blair-Brown-Starmer constitutional changes is to take power away not from Westminster but from us.
The Glorious Revolution of 1688 put the Crown under Parliamentary control, counterbalancing it with a Protestant male bourgeoisie. In the centuries since then we have seen a Glorious Evolution into a secular non-sexist democracy with religious and ceremonial trappings.
At long last we the people who are subject to the law are at the same time the citizens who make the law, through our representatives. Since 1928, all adults have had an equal voice in national self-government.
It is our country.
This is what ideologues want to smash.
After Hitler invaded Russia a London publican said to Claud Cockburn (p. 226):
“I can see it coming, Claud. The Communists are going to take over the country when this little lot’s finished with. And I don’t say they shouldn’t. I don’t say you don’t have common human justice on your side, Claud. All I ask of you is just one thing.”
“What’s that, Harry?”
“All I ask, Claud, is when you and your pals take over and make that great revolution, that you’ll just leave me my King, my constitution and my country.”
He had tears in his eyes, and it was hard not to be able to offer him a binding guarantee.
The power of Parliament is awesome. If sufficiently explicit an Act passed by both Houses and receiving royal assent overrides any other law, treaty or authority anywhere. That is absolute sovereignty. The Crown in Parliament is not bound by any principle or aim other than the expression of the people’s will in pursuance of the nation’s interests.
Its unpredictability and complete liberty is what political zealots cannot stand; they wish to replace a purely procedural system with some program and administrative arrangement that embodies their philosophy, and then our debates can be at an end.
Nor is it only the Left that undermines us. We have been betrayed on all sides by Quislings enriching themselves by colluding with multinational corporations and supranational organisations trending towards centralised global control. If they succeed we shall find that absolute power, as Baron Acton said, corrupts absolutely, and that ‘RULERS,’ as Coleridge said, ‘are as bad as they dare to be.’
How quickly will politicians shake off the common people who give them legitimation! A touchstone for this misbehaviour is the German foreign minister Annalena Baerbock’s arrogant dismissal of democracy when she said she would stand with Ukraine ‘no matter what my German voters think.’ It is especially ironic that she was not voted into the Bundestag personally, but simply through leading the Green Party under Germany’s proportional representation set-up.
Our own system is still imperfect, and has flaws that can be exploited by the ruthless to turn it into a self-destroying machine. When in 1780 John Dunning moved that ‘The influence of the Crown has increased, is increasing, and ought to be diminished’ it was not anticipated that the office of the Prime Minister might become a tyranny, using the monarch’s royal prerogative; yet (for example) almost the first act of Blair’s New Labour Government was to politicise the Civil Service in a Privy Council meeting. The comprehensive damage to our constitution had been planned in advance like a bank raid.
In 1789 Thomas Jefferson mooted a periodic constitutional convention so that the living citizens of the United States could re-determine how they governed themselves. If we British value our freedom then we must find some way to do the same; it cannot be left to a crypto-Communist cabal ruling us on the basis of a freakish electoral result that has already lost a significant portion of its tiny minority of supporters after less than four months.